Home Blog Page 55

AOC: Joe Biden’s $2 Trillion Infrastructure Plan ‘Needs to Be Way Bigger’

(Breitbart) – President Joe Biden’s $2 trillion infrastructure plan, dubbed the American Jobs Plan, is not sufficient and “needs to be way bigger,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said on Tuesday prior to the proposal’s formal unveiling.

Biden is outlining his $2 trillion plan on Wednesday, which devotes roughly $174 billion to the electric vehicle market, $115 billion to modernize bridges, highways, and roads, $50 billion in semiconductor manufacturing and research, $25 billion in airports, $10 billion investment in enforcement to “ensure employers are providing workers with good jobs,” $10 billion investment for Civilian Climate Corps, and more, as Breitbart News highlighted .

Ocasio-Cortez, however, does not believe it is sufficient, as the $2 trillion proposal spreads out over the next decade.

“This is not nearly enough. The important context here is that it’s $2.25T spread out over 10 years,” she said. “For context, the COVID package was $1.9T for this year *alone,* with some provisions lasting 2 years.”

“Needs to be way bigger,” the New York lawmaker added:

Biden is expected to formally outline the proposal in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania sometime Wednesday afternoon. The measure, if passed, would increase the corporate tax rate from 21 percent to 28 percent, soaring over the 25 percent corporate tax rate of Communist China.

Republicans do not appear to be on board with Biden’s economic proposal, particularly as the economy continues to recover from the battering it took during the Chinese coronavirus pandemic last year.

“No president has ever raised business taxes to recover from an economic crisis,” Rep. Kevin Brady (R-TX), Ranking Member of the House Ways and Means Committee, said. “This couldn’t come at a worse time.”


How Bill Gates premeditated Covid vaccine injury censorship

(NOQReport) – Share the truth STORY AT-A-GLANCE

In 2000, everything about Bill Gates’ public persona changed. He morphed from a hardnosed and ruthless technology monopolizer into a soft, fuzzy and incredibly generous philanthropist when he and his wife launched the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. 1

It was a public relations coup. May 18, 1998, the U.S. Justice Department, in collaboration with 20 state attorneys, filed an antitrust lawsuit against Microsoft. 2 At that time, the company was 23 years old and was ruling the personal computer market. The Seattle Times described the fallout from the antitrust lawsuit: 3

“The company barely escaped being split up after it was ruled an unlawful monopolist in 2000 for using its stranglehold on the PC market with its Windows operating system to cripple competitors, such as Netscape’s Navigator Web browser.”

How would the world be different today if the company had been split? Yale law professor George Priest described the antitrust lawsuit as “one of the most important antitrust cases of its generation.” 4 In 2002, a court settlement placed restrictions on Microsoft to curb some of its practices for five years.

It was later extended twice and then expired May 12, 2011. The lawsuit had a dramatic effect on “the emergence of an entirely new field called IP (intellectual property) antitrust,” Iowa law professor Herbert Hovenkamp told the Seattle Times. 5

Later, large sums donated from the foundation made the news multiple times, including $9.5 million to GAVI (Global Alliance for Vaccines), a second $7.5 million to GAVI and $6.8 million to the World Health Organization in 2017. 6

By June 2020, in the middle of a global pandemic, the Gates Foundation’s donations totaled 45% of WHO’s funding from nongovernmental sources. 7 Once mainstream media’s attention was no longer on Gates’ antitrust activities and focused on the philanthropist actions of the foundation, Gates publicly turned his attention to vaccinating the world, long before COVID-19. 8

Event 201: A Preplanned Pandemic

In a deep dive into the Gates Foundation’s charitable donations, The Nation found there were $250 million in grants to companies where the foundation held corporate stocks, including Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Sanofi and Medtronic. The money was directed at supporting projects “like developing new drugs and health monitoring systems and creating mobile banking services.” 9

What Gates had discovered was an easy path to political power, allowing him to shape public policy without being elected to office. In other words, favorable headlines could be bought with charitable contributions . 10 One event that Gates has personally supported and participated in was Event 201. 11

Writing in The Defender, Robert Kennedy Jr. describes the exercise that Gates organized in October 2019. Many high-ranking men and women with governmental authority participated in Event 201, which coincidentally simulated a worldwide pandemic triggered by a novel coronavirus, just months before SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, changed the world. 12

They included representatives from the World Economic Forum, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Johns Hopkins University Population Center, the World Bank, the Chinese government and vaccine maker Johnson & Johnson. During the event, the group developed strategies to control a pandemic, the population and the narrative surrounding the event.

At no time did they investigate using current therapeutic drugs and vitamins or communicating information about building immune systems. Instead, the aim was to develop and distribute patentable antiviral medications and a new wave of vaccines.

As Kennedy reports, Gates spoke to the BBC 13 April 12, 2020, and claimed these types of simulations had not occurred, saying “Now here we are. You know we didn’t simulate this; we didn’t practice, so both the health policies and economic policies … we find ourselves in uncharted territories.”

Yet, videos of the event are available 14 and Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security released a statement naming the Gates Foundation as a partner in sponsoring the pandemic simulation. 15 It seems strange and alarming that a man with the responsibility of running the Gates Foundation and the powerful influence he has over global public policy decisions had forgotten an exercise he organized only six months before the interview. 16 Or was it deception?

Uncanny Prediction or Planned Event?

During the pandemic exercise, the global experts “modeled a fictional coronavirus pandemic.” 17 After questions arose about whether the exercise had “predicted the outbreak in China,” Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security released a thinly supported statement, saying: 18

“… the exercise served to highlight preparedness and response challenges that would likely arise in a very severe pandemic … Although our tabletop exercise included a mock novel coronavirus, the inputs we use for modeling the potential impact of that fictional virus are not similar to nCoV-2019.”

Kennedy characterizes the fourth simulation in Event 201, writing that “the participants primarily focused on planning industry-centric, fear-mongering, police-state strategies for managing an imaginary global coronavirus contagion culminating in mass censorship of social media.” 19

The transcript of the fourth simulation shows that the participants discussed communication strategies using dissemination of information and censorship on social media. 20 , 21 Communication strategist Hasti Taghi, who works for a major media company and leads strategic initiatives with the World Economic Forum, 22 said:

“So, I think a couple of things we have to consider are even before this began, the anti-vaccine movement was very strong and this is something specifically through social media that has spread.

So, as we do the research to come up with the right vaccines to help prevent the continuation of this, how do we get the right information out there? How do we communicate the right information to ensure that the public has trust in these vaccines that we’re creating?”

The question the group undertook wasn’t how to communicate the truth about the vaccine development, manufacture and distribution, but rather how to “communicate the right information to ensure the public has trust in these vaccines that we’re creating?”

The issue of gaining public trust to take a vaccine was significant in this simulation, even though the U.S. population is well indoctrinated in the perceived value of annual flu shots and childhood vaccinations. In fact, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has a list of 26 different types of vaccines currently in use in the U.S.

In addition to the long list of recommended childhood vaccinations, there are adult vaccines against shingles, tetanus and pneumococcal pneumonia that are routinely given. Why, then, did the global experts in communication and control believe communicating the “right information” would be necessary to “ensure the public trust”?

Group Calls for Social Media Censorship

This was only one of the highly predictive conversations during Event 201 that played out in 2020 as the global COVID-19 pandemic unfolded. George Gao, director-general, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 23 predicted: 24

“By and long, we have more cases in China and also death cases reported. And also, my staff told me that before there’s misinformation and there’s some belief. People believe, ‘This is a manmade … some pharmaceutical company made the virus,’ so there’s some violations of human … That is because of this misinformation.”

Others agreed with the need for social media censorship as it may pertain to the spread of “disinformation” about the pandemic or vaccines and vaccine injury, without regard to the source. The idea was to remove any information that did not align with the government’s mandates and ideas. Kevin McAleese, who is a communications officer with a Gates-funded agricultural project, said: 25

“To me, it is clear countries need to make strong efforts to manage both mis- and disinformation … If the solution means controlling and reducing access to information, I think it’s the right choice.”

During the ensuing conversation, Tom Inglesby, director of the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, 26 replied, “In this case, do you think governments are at the point where they need to require social media companies to operate in a certain way?” 27

At each step of the simulation, the global “experts” agreed that information censorship through media platforms would be necessary to control the flow of the “right information” in order for people to willingly follow the leader.

What is interesting about the transcript from Event 201 is that what was planned and shared was frighteningly close to what has happened since January 2020. It may have been a coincidence to predict one or two major public health decisions, but it appears that the group was either phenomenally prophetic or they shaped the decisions and events of 2020 from behind the scenes.

Framing the Vaccine Message to Trigger Action

From the outside, the driving force behind economically devastating lockdowns , warp speed vaccine development and population control and surveillance strategies has been to “flatten the curve” and lower the death rate of SARS-CoV-2. Yet, as I and others have exposed, when these strategies are analyzed, it’s apparent there is more than what meets the eye.

In July 2020, Yale University 28 announced a study of the trigger words and phrases that would have a higher likelihood of promoting an otherwise individualistic society to quietly follow mandates (not laws) to control behavior. The phrases tested were believed to be most successful at conveying feelings about health, helping others and fear .

The hope was to manipulate behavior in such a way that it lowered the governmental risk for riots and dissidence. The study was conducted by Yale University using 4,000 participants who were randomized to receive one of 12 different messages. After the message, they were then evaluated to “compare the reported willingness to get a COVID-19 vaccine at three and six months of it becoming available.” 29

The primary outcome of the study was to find the right combination of phrases and messaging that would increase the number of people who got the vaccine. The study began July 3, 2020, and the last participant underwent testing by July 8, 2020. 30 To date, the results of the study have not been published.

The president of the U.S. announced in July 2020 that there would be an “overwhelming” vaccine campaign launched by November 2020. 31 In December 2020, the National Institutes of Health released a COVID-19 vaccination communication recommending behavioral and social science actions that might address vaccine hesitancy and increase the number who take the vaccine, including: 32

Framing accepting a vaccine as a social norm including “promotional materials that induced peer pressure to vaccinate.” Encouraging those who vaccinate to share their positive experience on social media. Nudging a person into accepting the vaccine by making it convenient and easy, leveraging electronic portals to send messages and using competition, gamification and incentives to encourage behavioral changes. Assessing the values of the target audience and then embedding those values into messages about vaccinations. Examples might include being a protector of the community, building on desires to go back to normal activities or as a way of enacting equality and social justice by protecting vulnerable people. In other words, many of the messages that you’ve been seeing in the media and your doctor’s office have been designed to trigger emotions that would lead you to take the vaccine. These same pressure tactics are not routinely used in the media for some of the more common adult vaccinations including pneumococcal, tetanus, hepatitis or shingles vaccines.

It’s Time to Speak With One Voice and Fight for Freedom

As I’ve written before, what we lose as a society when we acquiesce to these mandates and controls will be exponentially harder to get back. One of the freedoms we give away is allowing our thoughts and beliefs to be censored on social media without fighting back.

It is essential to safeguard your constitutional rights and civil liberties against unlawful overreach, and yet many appear to be willing to give up easily. Although the government has a duty to protect the health and welfare of its citizens, this must be balanced against the loss of civil rights and liberties.

We’re currently facing a battle of freedom versus tyranny. For example, multiple studies have demonstrated that long-term lockdowns are clearly not in the public’s best interest. 33 , 34 Instead, it’s tantamount to abuse. And yet many have gone along with these mandates, which were not laws.

It’s vital to understand that the vast majority of information you consume in mainstream media is carefully designed propaganda that has been crafted from nearly two decades of personal data collected from you.

Although Yale University undertook a study with 4,000 participants for a COVID-19 messaging campaign, that data had been gathered and collated through your use of social media.

As I have carefully identified in many previous articles, this plan will result in a progressive loss of your freedom and liberty that eventually results in tyranny and slavery. It is crucial to be vigilant and seek the truth so that you can understand how to distinguish between fact and a fictional narrative that promises you liberation but eventually enslaves you.

My newest book, ” The Truth About COVID-19 ,” will be available April 29, 2021, on Amazon. In it, I investigate the origins of the virus and how the elite has used it to slowly erode your personal liberty and freedom. In addition, I’ll also show you how to protect yourself against the disease and what you can do to fight back against the technocratic overlords.

The book goes into detail about pandemic profiteers. While I’m not thrilled about associating with Amazon, by pushing the book ranking up on their platform – one of the biggest tech companies who are benefiting from this global pandemic – we are actually using it to get the word out about them.

The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) recently posted more than 50 video presentations from the pay-for-view Fifth International Public Conference on Vaccination held online October 16 to 18, 2020, and made them available to everyone for free.

The conference’s theme was ” Protecting Health and Autonomy in the 21st Century ” and it featured physicians, scientists and other health professionals, human rights activists, faith community leaders, constitutional and civil rights attorneys, authors and parents of vaccine injured children talking about vaccine science, policy, law and ethics and infectious diseases, including coronavirus and COVID-19 vaccines.

In December 2020, a U.K. company published false and misleading information about NVIC and its conference, which prompted NVIC to open up the whole conference for free viewing. The conference has everything you need to educate yourself and protect your personal freedoms and liberties with respect to your health.

Don’t miss out on this incredible opportunity. I was a speaker at this empowering conference and urge you to watch these video presentations before they’re censored and taken away by the technocratic elite.


Joe Biden’s Dog Major Involved in Second Biting Incident

(Breitbart) – One of the Biden family dogs – a three-year-old German shepherd named Major – was involved in a second biting incident at the White House, according to a Tuesday afternoon report.

CNN wrote:

The incident, which involved a National Park Service employee, took place on the White House South Lawn on Monday afternoon. The employee was working at the time and needed to stop in order to receive treatment from the White House medical unit. Asked about this latest episode, first lady Jill Biden’s press secretary Michael LaRosa told CNN: “Yes, Major nipped someone on a walk. Out of an abundance of caution, the individual was seen by WHMU and then returned to work.”

On March 8, Major first found himself in the dog house after biting a Secret Service employee at the White House. The employee’s injury was concerning enough to require treatment from members of the White House medical team.

White House press secretary Jen Psaki later downplayed the injury as “minor,” saying the incident was due to Major “getting acclimated” to his new home. The German shepherd was “surprised by an unfamiliar person,” Psaki added. Following the incident, both Major and Champ – the Bidens’ other German shepherd – were sent to the president’s hometown of Wilmington, Delaware, but later returned to the White House.

Earlier this March, President Biden called Major a “sweet dog” and said he was undergoing training.

“You turn a corner, and there’s two people you don’t know at all. And [Major] moves to protect,” said Biden. “But he’s a sweet dog. Eighty-five percent of the people there love him,” the president told ABC News. “He just – all he does is lick them and wag his tail. But … I realize some people, understandably, are afraid of dogs to begin with.”

However, as CNN previously reported, Major is known to “display agitated behavior on multiple occasions, including jumping, barking, and ‘charging’ at staff and security.”

Major was adopted by the Biden family in 2018.


It’s okay to be racist when…

(NOQReport) – Share the truth

One of the tenets of Critical Race Theory is to see racism in everything. I talked about that in my ebook – ” Racism Reimagined: How Critical Race Theory Imperils the American Workplace .” Whenever I see reports of hate crimes, I tend to be skeptical. This is not to say that hate crimes do not exist. They certainly do . However, I do not believe that they occur at the rates the mainstream media and the culture of leftist victimhood would have me believe. Case in point, check out this quote from Campus Reform :

Over the past five years, nearly 1,200 Michigan State University students and staff members reported racial discrimination incidents. Only eight instances, however, truly violated the school’s bias and discrimination policies .

According to data provided to the Lansing State Journal by Michigan State’s Office of Institutional Equity, affiliates reported 1,187 instances of race-based bias and discrimination between 2015 and September 2020. Of those instances, 76 revealed issues with conduct, and of those 76 issues, eight instances – less than 1 percent of all reported – constituted violations of the school’s policies.

Campus Reform independently confirmed this data with Michigan State University Office of Institutional Equity spokesperson Christian Chapman.

Nevertheless, Tanya Jachimiak – the head of the Office of Institutional Equity – told the Lansing State Journal that a committee is currently “looking at how and where our policy is able to address and be part of the solution to breaking down systems of oppression.”

Similarly, in spite of an average of less than two racial bias incidents per year, several departments and schools at Michigan State recently released statements and calls to action against racism.

When I read that I was not surprised as I think some of my readers may be. Last year, in the face of Jussie Smollett and Bubba Wallace race hoaxes, I did research on race hoaxes and produced a timeline of race hoaxes ranging from 2007 – 2020. I found 100+. Click here to review the timeline . At some point, I had to stop because it was beginning to feel overwhelming. If you want a more recent list of race crime hoaxes, check out the fake hate crimes database or HoaxHateCrimes.com .

And while we are on the topic of racism, it is amazing to me the standards that are acceptable in our society because clearly some of it is acceptable. It just depends on the group you are in. (Critical Race Theory supports this assertion. Oh, how I hate it.) For example, consider what happened recently at Yale University. NBC News reported:

The Justice Department told a federal judge Wednesday that it is dropping a high-profile discrimination lawsuit against Yale University that was brought by the Trump administration.

A two-sentence filing in U.S. District Court in Connecticut gave notice of the government’s “voluntary dismissal of this action.”

The case had marked an escalation in the Trump Justice Department’s attacks on affirmative action programs that many conservatives consider illegal.

Yale said it was gratified by the decision to drop the lawsuit.

What was the gist of the lawsuit? NBC explains further.

The lawsuit, which was filed in October, said a two-year investigation had determined that the Ivy League college illegally discriminated against Asian American and white students in admissions . It said they were only one-tenth to one-fourth as likely to be admitted as African American applicants with comparable academic records.

For the record, it is wrong and illegal to discriminate against any group. When the 2-year Yale investigation concluded last year, it was determined that “race is the determinative factor in hundreds of admissions decisions each year,” in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, according to the Department of Justice. ( Read it on the DOJ website for yourself. ) And while this move may benefit African Americans, it is still wrong and unfair. Despite that, it is acceptable racism because Asians and Whites typically are of higher class, economically speaking.

Consider the chart below.

Since Asians and Whites have the highest degree of household income in America, it’s okay to discriminate against them because the Hispanic and Black households are oppressed; argument being, the rich are rich because the poor are oppressed. The idea of someone being oppressed (or an oppressor) simply because of the color of their skin is something I very much disagree with. (In case you’re curious, listen to my podcast episode ” Its Culture Not Color That Holds Us Back ” or my rather lengthy article by the same name . But, I digress.

  • Racism exists in America.
  • America is not a racist country.

Both are provably true.

Pass it on.


BREAKING: AOC Breaks Silence on Border Crisis… This Was UNBELIEVABLE

(The Post Millennial) – In an Instagram live stream on Tuesday night, Congresswoman Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) claimed that calling the mass influx of illegal aliens at the Southern Border an “invasion” is a “white supremacist idea.”

While discussing the record-breaking crisis at the US southern border, Representative Ocasio-Cortez said “Anyone who is using the term ‘surge’ around you consciously is trying to invoke a militaristic frame… This is not a surge. These are children and they are not insurgents.”

The congresswoman from New York went on to express that our country is not being invaded, despite the clear evidence of the southern border being currently invaded by illegal aliens.

Moments later, AOC devised a new definition to the word “invasion” indicating it is a “white supremacist idea.”

According to definitions from the Merriam Webster dictionary, the Representative’s definition does not match one of the many provided.

Last weekend, a group of republican senators took a trip down to the southern border and exposed the shocking current conditions in an attempt to alert the public about the humanitarian crisis after the Biden administration blocked journalists from reporting on the conditions as well as placing a gag-order on US Customs and Border Protection.

Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) posted a video to Twitter that allegedly showed human traffickers and cartel members attempting to cross the Rio Grande River as they taunted Border Patrol.

“The other side of the river we have been listening to and seeing cartel members, human traffickers, right on the other side of the river waving flashlights, yelling and taunting Americans, taunting the border control because they know that under the current policy of the Biden Administration they can flood over here. They’re getting paid $4,000 to $5,000 a person to smuggle them into this country and our policies, when they smuggle them in, the Biden Administration releases them,” Cruz said in a press conference.

“Last month 100,000 people came across the border illegally. We have 15,000 kids in federal government custody. This is a humanitarian crisis. It’s a public health crisis. The illegal immigrants that get released they’re testing positive for covid-19 at a seven times higher rate than the American population. And it’s a national security crisis. And it’s time for the Biden Administration to put an end to it and stop sanctioning lawless chairs on our southern border,” he continues.

Senator James Lankford (R-OK) filmed a shocking video that detailed a loophole illegal aliens use to gain entrance into the United States.

According to Senator Lankford, there is a wide-opening in the border where a bridge runs through where immigrants flood into the United States illegally. No matter how many family members are over the age of six, the entire family will be released into the United States and given a ‘notice to appear’—a court date that could be three years later.

The video posted by Lankford on Twitter shows hundreds of migrants that came into to the United States illegally getting ready to be released into the US.


HA! One of Biden’s Dogs Just Pooped on the White House Floor

(The Post Millennial) – It appears Joe Biden is having trouble with his pet dogs once again. According to the press pool, one of the dogs relieved himself on the White House floor.

The accident happened outside of the Diplomatic Room in the White House. “There was dog poo on the floor. It’s unclear which dog was responsible for it,” CBS White House reporter Kathryn Watson said.

Earlier this week, one of Biden’s dogs, Major, was involved in another biting incident.

“Yes, Major nipped someone on a walk. Out of an abundance of caution, the individual was seen by WHMU and then returned to work without injury,” Jill Biden’s press secretary told CNN.
The dogs were previously banished to Delaware after Major bit a an ‘unfamiliar person’ in early March.

“[Champ and Major] are still getting acclimated and accustomed to their surroundings and new people. And on Monday, the first family’s younger dog, Major, was surprised by an unfamiliar person and reacted in a way that resulted in a minor injury to the individual,” White House press sec Jen Psaki said at the time.


Watch: Kamala Laughs Hysterically While Discussing Struggling Parents Unable to Send Kids to School

(InfoWars) – Footage showing Kamala Harris breaking into hysterical laughter while discussing sending children back to school is terrifying the internet.

The incident was caught on film during a speech at the West Haven Child Development Center in West Haven, Conn., last week.

In the clip, Harris begins laughing uncontrollably while talking about parents who can’t send their kids to school while at the same time being unable to afford child care for their children.

“More people are seeing that, yeah, affordable child care is a big deal,” Kamala said. “More parents are seeing the value of educators when they [laughter] had to bring their kids [home] and say we’re not paying them nearly enough [laughter].”

The footage comes one week after Harris bursted into cackles when asked by reporters on the tarmac whether she planned to visit the southern border to witness the crisis firsthand.

Even more disturbing: this is the person first in line to succeed Biden should he be unable to finish his term.

Border Patrol Becoming Human Traffickers Under Biden


The post Watch: Kamala Laughs Hysterically While Discussing Struggling Parents Unable to Send Kids to School appeared first on The Original MinuteMan Project.

JUST IN: Biased Left-Wing Witness Gets HUMILIATED at Derek Chauvin Trial

(BigLeaguePolitics) – A biased left-wing firefighter was dressed down in the court of law by a federal judge on Wednesday during the murder trial of former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin.

Hennepin County Judge Peter Cahill humiliated Genevieve Hansen, an off-duty firefighter who watched in the crowd as serial felon George Floyd died, because of her incredibly unprofessional behavior toward the defense that was jeopardizing the integrity of the entire court proceeding.

“Ms. Hanson, I am advising you. Do not argue with counsel and specifically do not argue with the court,” he said.

“Are the cameras on?” she responded.

“No they are not, we are on the record. You will not argue with the court. You will not argue with counsel. They have the right to ask questions. Your job is to answer them,” Cahill said.

The exchange can be seen here:

A portion of Hansen’s disgraceful testimony can be seen here:

Big League Politics has reported on how the murder case against Chauvin is falling apart due to lack of evidence as jurors figure out ways to depart from the case:

” Two jurors have been removed from the Derek Chauvin case following a $27 million payout to George Floyd’s family from the city of Minneapolis.

The jurors said that the massive payout biased them and prevented them from being impartial while considering the case. This happened after they were questioned about the settlement by Hennepin County District Court Judge Peter Cahill.

One dismissed juror was a Hispanic man in his 20s who claimed that the cash payout to Floyd’s family affected his ability to be impartial by “a lot.”

“So, last time I was asked about my strong opinions against Chauvin,” he said to Cahill. “Clearly the city of Minneapolis has some strong opinions, as well. And this just kind of confirms my opinions that I already had.”

The other dismissed juror was a white man in his 30s who stated that the “dollar amount was kind of shocking to me. That kind of sent the message that the city of Minneapolis felt that something was wrong and they wanted to make it right to the tune of that dollar amount.”

“I think in the headline if it would have said $2,000 versus $20 million, that’s a big change,” the juror said. “So I think that sticker price obviously shocked me and kind of swayed me a little bit, yes.”

Two other jurors told the judge that the news did not change their opinions or otherwise prejudice them regarding the case.

“I’ve been thinking about this question a lot. I don’t think so. It wasn’t surprising that the city made this settlement,” a female juror said. “I think they made their position clear when they decided to defund the police or take actions or steps towards that.”

“It hasn’t affected me at all because I don’t know the details,” a black male juror said. “I’m not a lawyer so obviously I don’t know what went into making that decision.” ‘

If Chauvin is acquitted, cities across the country will burn once again. This is the new reality of diverse and multicultural America where the mob reigns supreme.


The post Biased Left-Wing Witness Gets Humiliated by Judge at Derek Chauvin Murder Trial appeared first on The Original MinuteMan Project.

WATCH: Fox News Guests Have SCREAMING Match Over Tucker

(Breitbart) – Former White House Director of Strategic Communications Mercedes Schlapp and Democratic political commentator Chris Hahn had a screaming match Tuesday on Fox News Channel over the possibility of coronavirus vaccine passports.

Schlapp said, “The illogical mentality of the left where you are hearing this support for the vaccine passports. We’ve already seen Governor Cuomo move forward in this direction when in terms of having vaccine credentials when individuals are going to an entertainment venue. And then at the same time you have the Democrats saying, ‘Wait a second, you don’t need a voter ID to vote. When you get a COVID vaccine you have to show an ID.’ When you go to the doctor, you have to show an ID. Now you are seeing this movement towards saying yes, if you are going to go to these events and travel, you may need a vaccine passport. You have the Biden administration working with big tech to come up with this technology. I think all of it is troubling. We really need to step away from this issue because there are constitutional issues, privacy questions associated with these vaccine passports.”

“Here is what’s troubling – the private sector is driving it, not the government but Republicans, like everything else they’ve done during this horrible crisis we’ve been through are pushing these conspiracy theories that the government is trying to control you, which is causing some of their followers not to get vaccinated,” Hahn replied. “People like Tucker Carlson, like Jim Jordan, like Mercedes right here, right now casting doubt on the fact that – or trying to convince people that the government is somehow watching you, that is very irresponsible.”

He added, “It is time for conservatives in this country to acknowledge that we have a crisis and start joining the fight to end it and stop spreading lies about what’s going on in this country. It is devastating this country and blood is on the hand of the former guy and others who support him.”

Schlapp said, “Chris, I am not going to take this from you. You are not going to call me a liar. You are not going to call me a conspiracy theorist. You are not going to call Tucker Carlson a conspiracy theorist.”

Hahn shot back, “He is. He is, and you are.”

Schlapp said, “This is what the Democrats do. They keep calling us names. We’re not put up with this. I stand for freedom. I stand for the freedom of the American people every single day.”

“No, you don’t,” Hahn stated. “You’re a grifter. This is ridiculous.”

Guest host Gillian Turner said, “Let’s not do name-calling guys.”

Schlapp said, “But I’m not going to allow Chris – he does this all the time -to call me, to call Tucker Carlson a liar.”

“We don’t do name-calling,” Turner reiterated.

Schlapp added, “We have every right to make this decision for our families to be vacated or not.”

Follow Pam Key On Twitter @pamkeyNEN


The post Watch: Fox News Guests Have Screaming Match After Tucker Carlson Called a Conspiracy Theorist appeared first on The Original MinuteMan Project.

Pence “Laying Groundwork” For a 2024 Presidential Bid?

(TreeHouse) – Not an April fool’s joke, but it might as well be.

Two media reports [ Here and Here ] about former VP Mike Pence considering a potential run for President in 2024 present the most laughable political hypothetical in recent memory. Particularly, and specifically, because even President Trump would likely not include Pence in a short list of people for endorsement.

” WASHINGTON (AP) – Former President Donald Trump recently rattled off the names of those he viewed as future leaders of the Republican Party, including Sens. Josh Hawley and Ted Cruz along with Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis. Conspicuously absent from the list: Mike Pence.

The former vice president is steadily reentering public life as he eyes a potential run for the White House in 2024.”

Newsmax has a similar story outlining steps Mike Pence appears to be making to lean forward to the 2024 GOP primary. However, as pointed out by both articles, President Trump has not included his former VP in any positive affirmation about the future of the republican party.

NewsMax – […] “Since leaving office in January, Pence, who was Indiana’s governor and a member of Congress before being tapped as Trump’s running mate, has kept a lower profile. He’s pieced together a portfolio aimed at maintaining influence, paying the bills, and laying the groundwork for an expected presidential run.

He’s forged a partnerships with the conservative Heritage Foundation and has even been discussed as a potential president of the organization, according to two people familiar with the discussions. He’s joined the Young America’s Foundation and a top speakers’ bureau, penned an op-ed for the Daily Signal about the 2020 election, and recently toured a Christian relief organization in North Carolina. He will make his first public speech since leaving office next month at the Palmetto Family Council’s annual fundraiser in South Carolina, another crucial primary state.

Pence also has discussed writing a book, according to aides, has been in continued conversation with his evangelical allies, and plans to spend much of the next two years helping Republican candidates as they try to reclaim House and Senate majorities in 2022.


The post Pence “Laying Groundwork” For a 2024 Presidential Bid? appeared first on The Original MinuteMan Project.