Home Blog Page 2

Shock Video of Brazen Shoplifting in Democrat-Run San Fran Goes Viral

(Breitbart) – How bad are things in Democrat-run San Francisco? Well, a video posted on the verified Twitter account of Lyanne Melendez, a reporter for ABC7 in San Francisco (is “Lyanne” a great name for a journalist, or what?*), shows a guy on a bike inside a Walgreens store filling a trash bag with merchandise right in front of the store’s security guard.

Then he blithely cruises past with no fear of being stopped or caught.

Will you look at that. Lol.

Sadly, in Democrat-run San Francisco, this is not just normal, it’s darn near legal. By a margin of 60 to 40 percent in a 2014 referendum, California’s idiot voters basically decriminalized shoplifting. If the value of the stolen merchandise doesn’t exceed $950, it’s no longer a felony. Anything $950 and below is a simple misdemeanor. How sweet is that?

As a result of this total breakdown of civil law and order, already 17 Walgreens have fled the City by the Bay.

How much longer can the rest of the stores hold out with this kind of brazen criminality? Keep in mind, Walgreens isn’t just losing all this merchandise… Would you shop at a store where this stuff goes on?

And don’t blame the security guard… If the people of San Francisco are okay with this, why should he risk getting hurt or sued?

Besides, we’re supposed to feel sorry for a city loaded with people who think like this:

Yep, that’s Cynthia Nixon raging at CVS for not allowing people to steal.

The thing to keep in mind is this… Democrats choose to live this way. This is a choice . They want to live this way and sincerely believe it’s a form of moral supremacy over us Trumptards in Rural America who do backward things such as enforcing the law, standing for the flag, and treating others as we would like to be treated and expecting the same from them.

You see, these leftist lunatics are so eager to show us their superiority that in the process, they are destroying their own neighborhoods and cities; not to mention dooming a generation of young people to a warped mindset that says criminality is legitimate.

Every decent person knows you are not helping these kids by letting them get away with dangerous behavior. If you want to help them, give them school vouchers, teach them there are consequences for their actions, and offer up a do-over when they turn 18.

*I’m not familiar with Lyanne Melendez’s work and wasn’t commenting on her personal integrity. It was just a joke and a really good one, so relax.


COVID, Ivermectin and the Crime of the Century


In the video above, DarkHorse podcast host Bret Weinstein Ph.D., interviews Dr. Pierre Kory about the importance of early treatment of COVID-19 and the shameful censoring of information about ivermectin, which has been shown to be very useful against this infection.

It’s no small irony then that YouTube deleted this interview, which is why I embedded a Bitchute version. How this interview could possibly be labeled as misinformation is a mystery, considering all they do is discuss published research. Not to mention, they’re both credentialed medical science experts.

Kory, a lung and ICU specialist and former professor of medicine at St. Luke’s Aurora Medical Center in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, is the president and chief medical officer 1 of the Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC). Another founding member of FLCCC is Dr. Paul Marik 2 who, as noted by Kory, is the most-published intensive care specialist who is still practicing medicine and seeing patients.

Marik, known for having created an effective sepsis treatment protocol , was asked by a group of peers early on in the pandemic to help create a treatment protocol for COVID-19. The resulting collaboration led to the creation of the FLCCC. Each of the five founding members has treated critical illnesses for decades and, as Weinstein says, they are “unimpeachable. You couldn’t ask for better credentials. You couldn’t ask for a better publication record.”

Yet, despite stellar credentials and being on the frontlines treating hundreds of COVID-19 patients, they have been dismissed as “kooks on the fringe, making wild-eyed claims,” Weinstein says. How can that be? Initially, the FLCCC insisted, based on the evidence, that COVID-19 was a corticosteroid-dependent disease and that corticosteroids were a crucial part of effective treatment.

“I was actually invited to give Senate testimony back in May [2020] where I testified that it was critical to use corticosteroids; that lives are being lost [because we weren’t using it],” Kory says.

“As you might know, I got killed for that. We got killed for that. We were totally criticized for not having an evidence-base. [Yet] our reading of the evidence was that you had to use it. So that basically that’s how we came together, and that was the first components of our protocol.”

Ivermectin Suitable for All Treatment Stages

The FLCCC’s COVID-19 protocol was initially dubbed MATH+ (an acronym based on the key components of the treatment), but after several tweaks and updates, the prophylaxis and early outpatient treatment protocol is now known as I-MASK+ 3 while the hospital treatment has been renamed I-MATH+, 4 due to the addition of ivermectin.

The two protocols – I-MASK+ 5 and I-MATH+ 6 – are available for download on the FLCCC Alliance website in multiple languages. The clinical and scientific rationale for the I-MATH+ hospital protocol has also been peer-reviewed and was published in the Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 7 in mid-December 2020.

Since those early days, the FLCCC has been vindicated and corticosteroids, as well as blood thinners, are now part of the standard of care for COVID-19 in many places. The same cannot be said for the remainder of the protocols, however, including the use of ivermectin, which continues to be suppressed, despite robust clinical evidence supporting its use in all phases of COVID-19. 8 , 9 As noted by the FLCCC: 10

“The data shows the ability of the drug Ivermectin to prevent COVID-19, to keep those with early symptoms from progressing to the hyper-inflammatory phase of the disease, and even to help critically ill patients recover.

… numerous clinical studies – including peer-reviewed randomized controlled trials – showed large magnitude benefits of Ivermectin in prophylaxis, early treatment and also in late-stage disease. Taken together … dozens of clinical trials that have now emerged from around the world are substantial enough to reliably assess clinical efficacy.”

Kory has testified to the benefits of ivermectin before a number of COVID-19 panels, including the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs in December 2020 11 and the National Institutes of Health COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel in January 2021. 12

A Disease of Phases

As noted by Kory, they rather quickly realized that COVID-19 was a disease with very specific phases, and that successful treatment depended on the phase the patient was currently in. It starts out as a general viral syndrome, much like a cold or flu. Most patients recover without incidence. However, in a subset of patients, things take a turn for the worse after Day 5. Their oxygen level starts dropping and lung inflammation sets in.

“We now know that it’s a cell called a macrophage that gets activated and attacks the lungs,” Kory explains. “So, you have this sort of immune response that is attacking the lungs and the lungs start to fail … So, it’s predominantly a severe lung disease …

We knew relatively early on that by the time they get to the ICU … there’s not a lot of viral replication on going on. In fact, you can’t culture a virus after about Day 7 or 8. So, it’s actually a disease of inflammation, not viral invasion …

So, you didn’t have to go after the virus at that point, you had to actually check the inflammation … What we think triggers [the] inflammation is actually the viral debris. It’s the RNA that triggers this massive response. It’s not the virus. It’s actually the debris of the dead virus that does it.”

Kory notes that after having treated the first handful of patients, he realized that anticoagulants, blood thinners, were needed, as there was abnormal blood clotting going on in all of them. Yet for some reason the medical community was, again, told not to do it because there were no clinical trials supporting the use of anticoagulants for a viral illness.

“It was bizarre,” Kory says. “They were like, you can’t observe, you can’t make clinical reasoning, you can’t deduce, you need a trial before you do [anything] … Everyone talks about evidence-based. I’m like, what about experience-based medicine? I’ve been doing this for 30 years. Why can’t I do what my experience tells me to do? …

You couldn’t actually doctor. I felt like I was being handcuffed. I I’ve never seen that in my life before … I have the sense that doctors have been forcibly demoted from the position of scientific clinician to technician …

I’ve never been asked before to get advice from … desk jockeys. I mean, they’re not on the front lines … I’ve never been asked to do that before. I’ve always been asked to use the best extent of my experience and judgment and insight to best help the patient. That’s the oath I took …

Instead we’re in this situation where if we open our mouth and say the wrong word, suddenly there are warnings appended to what we’ve said. It’s insane. It’s limiting discussion, limiting choices, limiting approaches.”

Overwhelming Evidence for Ivermectin

Kory spends a significant portion of the 2 1/2-hour interview reviewing the evidence for using ivermectin. This drug has a long history of use as an antiparasitic. It’s been credited with virtually eradicating onchocerciasis (river blindness), a condition caused by a parasitic worm. The drug was originally made from a soil organism found in Japan. However, as early as 2012, researchers started looking at ivermectin’s antiviral properties.

In April 2020, an Australian group showed ivermectin eradicated all viruses studied in as little as 48 hours, at least in the petri dish. Due to the state of emergency the world was in, some countries, including Peru, decided to recommend ivermectin to their population. It was well-known that the medication was safe, so the risk of doing so was very low.

As was the trend, Peruvian officials were roundly criticized for using an “unproven” remedy, and shortly thereafter, they removed it from the national guidelines. Some states continued to give it out, however, and according to Kory, each ivermectin campaign resulted in a precipitous decline in cases and deaths.

Literally, people are dying because they don’t know about this medicine. Providers are being told not to use the medicine … And I’ve never studied a medicine which has more evidence than this. ~ Dr. Pierre Kory

Marik was the first in the group to really take notice of the remarkable consistency in the studies using ivermectin. Kory dove into the research right behind him, and came to the conclusion that there indeed was something special about this drug. The population-based evidence was also very strong.

With regard to calls for randomized controlled trials, Kory points out that once you can see from clinical evidence that something really is working, then conducting controlled trials becomes more or less unethical, as you know you’re condemning the control group to poor outcomes or death. In fact, this is the exact same argument vaccine makers now use to justify the elimination of control groups by giving everyone the vaccine.

“When I posted our preprint November 13 [2020], I literally thought the pandemic was over,” Kory says. “We showed the basic science level. We showed multiple clinical trials. We showed the epidemiologic effects.

Everything was there to show that this is an intervention on the par of vaccines that could literally extinguish the pandemic, and quickly. I thought at the beginning that it was as simple as putting the evidence out there … and what happened? Crickets! Nothing happened …

I cannot believe that this is occurring. Literally, people are dying because they don’t know about this medicine. Providers are being told not to use the medicine … And I’ve never studied a medicine which has more evidence than this …

You have dozens of randomized controlled trials conducted by interested and committed clinicians from oftentimes low and middle income countries around the world. And there’s no conflicts of interest. None of them is going to make a million dollars by finding out that ivermectin works in COVID. None of them have a conflict of interest.”

For example, studies have shown ivermectin: 13

Inhibits replication of many viruses, including SARS-CoV-2 and seasonal influenza viruses – In ” COVID-19: Antiparasitic Offers Treatment Hope ,” I review data showing a single dose of ivermectin killed 99.8% of SARS-CoV-2 in 48 hours.

An observational study 14 from Bangladesh, which looked at ivermectin as a pre-exposure prophylaxis for COVID-19 among health care workers, found only four of the 58 volunteers who took 12 mg of ivermectin once per month for four months developed mild COVID-19 symptoms between May and August 2020, compared to 44 of the 60 health care workers who had declined the medication

Inhibits inflammation through several pathways

Lowers viral load

Protects against organ damage

Prevents transmission of SARS-CoV-2 when taken before or after exposure; speeds recovery and lowers risk of hospitalization and death in COVID-19 patients – The average reduction in mortality, based on 18 trials, is 75%. 15 A WHO-sponsored review 16 suggests ivermectin can reduce COVID-19 mortality by as much as 83%

Ivermectin Has Been Intentionally Suppressed

As noted by Weinstein, ivermectin appears to be intentionally suppressed. It’s simply not allowed to be a go-to remedy. The obvious question is why? Don’t they want to save lives? Isn’t that why we shut down the world?

“I would have these data arguments,” Kory says. “But it’s not about the data. There’s something else. There’s [something] out there that is just squashing, distorting, suppressing the efficacy of ivermectin, and its egregious.”

Indeed, as noted by Weinstein, it’s not even difficult to prove that ivermectin is being suppressed and censored. Censorship of certain COVID-related information, such as ivermectin, is written into the community guidelines. You’re not allowed to talk about it. If you do, your post will be censored, shadow-banned or taken down. If you persist, your entire account will be taken down.

Mexico’s Experience With Ivermectin

Another population-based experiment that demonstrates ivermectin’s real-world usefulness occurred in Mexico. Kory explains:

“Mexico did something which I think is the model for the world. I think, on a public health level, it’s what every country in the world should adopt, at a minimum. They [had a] clinicians committee.

They actually got expert clinicians [and] they gave them a seat at the table at the public health level. It’s called IMSS, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. That’s the agency which controls a good portion of their healthcare infrastructure, mostly outpatient, I think …

In December, hospitals were filling. It was a crisis almost like in India. They decided to deploy ivermectin using a test and treat strategy. Basically, anyone who appeared at the testing booths, if you tested positive, you were given ivermectin at a reasonably low dose … 12 milligrams … and only two days’ worth. They got four pills [at 3 mg each].

And when they did that, you saw across Mexico this precipitous decline in deaths and hospitalizations. And, if you look a few months later, right now – and this is publicly available data – look at the occupancy of beds in hospitals in Mexico, throughout the entire country, we’re talking about 25% to 30% occupancy.

There’s nobody in the hospitals in Mexico. They’ve basically decimated COVID in that country by using a test and treat strategy … Those were real public health leaders. They made a risk-benefit decision. They used their clinical judgment and expertise to have the right people at the table.”

As noted by Kory, the IMSS was attacked by the federal health minister, but they fought back, and laid out the evidence supporting their decision. This included studies showing a 50% to 75% reduction in hospitalizations using just that four-pill regimen.

As for the FLCCC, they recommend dosages between 0.2 mg and 0.4 mg per kilogram when taken at first signs of mild symptoms. For mild disease, they recommend continuing the drug for five days. For moderate disease, of if you start taking it late, they recommend continuing until you’re recovered.

The in-hospital protocol involves higher doses. Keep in mind, however, that the FLCCC protocols include several other remedies, not just ivermectin, so be sure to review the latest guidance. 17 , 18

Some regions in India have also used ivermectin. Kory believes the minister of Goa made some of the boldest moves in the world with regard to ivermectin, recommending all adults over the age of 18 to take ivermectin for five days, as a preventive. Uttar Pradesh also gave it out, while other states, such as Tamil Nadu, outlawed it. Here too, population-based data suggest ivermectin is tightly correlated with a decline in hospitalizations and deaths.

Where You Can Learn More

While ivermectin certainly appears to be a useful strategy, which is why I am covering it, it is not among my primary recommendations. In terms of prevention, I believe your best bet is to optimize your vitamin D level, as your body needs vitamin D for a wide variety of functions, including a healthy immune response.

What’s more, although ivermectin is a relatively safe drug, it can still have side effects. Vitamin D, on the other hand, is something your body absolutely requires for optimal health, which is why I would encourage you to focus on vitamin D first.

As for early treatment, I recommend nebulized hydrogen peroxide treatment, 19 , 20 which is inexpensive, highly effective and completely harmless when you’re using the low (0.04% to 0.1%) peroxide concentration recommended.

All of that said, ivermectin and several other remedies certainly have a place, and it’s good to know they exist and work well. On the whole, there’s really no reason to remain panicked about COVID-19. If you want to learn more about ivermectin, there are several places where you can do that, including the following:

April 24 through 25, 2021, Dr. Tess Lawrie, director of Evidence-Based Medicine Consultancy Ltd., 21 hosted the first International Ivermectin for COVID Conference online. 22

Twelve medical experts 23 from around the world – including Kory – shared their knowledge, reviewing mechanism of action, protocols for prevention and treatment, including so-called long-hauler syndrome, research findings and real world data. All of the lectures, which were recorded via Zoom, can be viewed on Bird-Group.org 24

An easy-to-read and print one-page summary of the clinical trial evidence for ivermectin can be downloaded from the FLCCC website 25

A more comprehensive, 31-page review of trials data has been published in the journal Frontiers of Pharmacology 26

The FLCCC website also has a helpful FAQ section where Kory and Marik answer common questions about the drug and its recommended use 27

A listing of all ivermectin trials done to date, with links to the published studies, can be found on c19Ivermectin.com 28

As noted by Lawrie during her closing address at the 2021 International Ivermectin for COVID Conference: 29

“The story of Ivermectin has highlighted that we are at a remarkable juncture in medical history. The tools that we use to heal and our connection with our patients are being systematically undermined by relentless disinformation stemming from corporate greed.

The story of Ivermectin shows that we as a public have misplaced our trust in the authorities and have underestimated the extent to which money and power corrupts.

Had Ivermectin being employed in 2020 when medical colleagues around the world first alerted the authorities to its efficacy, millions of lives could have been saved, and the pandemic with all its associated suffering and loss brought to a rapid and timely end …

With politicians and other nonmedical individuals dictating to us what we are allowed to prescribe to the ill, we as doctors, have been put in a position such that our ability to uphold the Hippocratic oath is under attack.

At this fateful juncture, we must therefore choose, will we continue to be held ransom by corrupt organizations, health authorities, Big Pharma, and billionaire sociopaths, or will we do our moral and professional duty to do no harm and always do the best for those in our care?

The latter includes urgently reaching out to colleagues around the world to discuss which of our tried and tested safe older medicines can be used against COVID.”


Breaking: Victoria’s Secret Cancels ‘Angels’, Hires Megan Rapinoe, Transgender Models Instead

(The Post Milennial) – Victoria’s Secret will no longer feature “Angels” as the main brand of their famed lingerie line. Instead, management has decided to transform the company and take the brand in an entirely new direction.

In a desperate attempt to rebuild the brand and to save face after woke activists smeared Victoria’s Secret of not being inclusive of all different body types, the company decided to hire spokeswomen to promote the brand through podcasts and other marketing materials called the VS Collective.

The spokeswomen that will be featured in a 10-episode podcast includes; soccer star and social justice warrior Megan Rapinoe, actress and feminist Priyanka Chopra, Brazilian transgender model Valentina Sampaio and others, Page Six reported.

However, the spokeswomen will allegedly stick to podcasting instead of modeling the brands sexy lingerie. “When the world was changing, we were too slow to respond,” Martin Waters, the chief executive of Victoria’s Secret told The New York Times. “We needed to stop being about what men want and to be about what women want.”

“For decades, Victoria’s Secret’s scantily-clad supermodels epitomized the height of femininity for millions. Now, the lingerie giant is not just trying to redefine itself — but also the very idea of what “sexy” is,” The New York Times said on Twitter.

“I’ve known that we needed to change this brand for a long time, we just haven’t had the control of the company to be able to do it,” Waters told The New York Times. “In the old days, the Victoria brand had a single lens, which was called ‘sexy.'”

US women’s soccer star Megan Rapinoe told The Times that there’s not a one-size-fits-all approach to sexiness.

“As a gay woman, I think a lot about what we think is sexy, and we are afforded the ability to do that, because I don’t have to wear the traditional sexy thing to be sexy and I don’t think the traditional thing is sexy when it comes to my partner or people I’ve dated,” Rapinoe told the outlet. “I think functionality is probably the sexiest thing we could possibly achieve in life. Sometimes just cool is sexy too.”

An insider told Page Six that, “It’s a group of women inspiring change and positivity. It’s another step they’re taking towards transforming the brand. The entire industry thought Victoria Secret was done.”


Bombshell: Corrupt Hunter Biden’s Artwork Selling for Half a Million Dollars Per Painting

(Breitbart) – President Joe Biden’s scandal-plagued son Hunter Biden is reportedly now engaged as a “full-time artist” and is working with Soho art dealer Georges Berg s to hold an exhibition in New York in the coming months, with prices for Hunter’s artwork ranging from $75,000 to $500,000, according to Artnet .

Amid years of scandal, the 51-year-old Hunter Biden is apparently now ” laying low ” in his Los Angeles home while working on his artwork. Berg s, his dealer, plans to host a “private viewing for Biden in Los Angeles this fall, followed by an exhibition in New York.” Berg s told Artnet that prices for Hunter’s work will “range from $75,000 for works on paper to $500,000 for large-scale paintings.”

“I don’t paint from emotion or feeling, which I think are both very ephemeral,” Biden said of his work. “For me, painting is much more about kind of trying to bring forth what is, I think, the universal truth.”

According to the New York Post , Berg s has some ties to China. The art dealer reportedly “regularly features works by Chinese artists and told a Chinese network that he was keen to open other art galleries in Beijing and Shanghai in 2015.”

Berg s has lavished praise on China’s role in the art world. In 2014, Berg s told the Chinese state-owned media outlet China Daily, “The questions that I always had was how’s China changing the world in terms of art and culture.”

Hunter Biden’s newfound venture does little to distract from the ongoing concerns that he could perhaps be trading on his family name, as he and other members of the Biden family have been accused of doing in the past.

Hunter’s entry into the art world follows years of his endeavors in the world of international finance where he has been criticized for engaging in business ventures with countries at a time when his then-vice president father was negotiating U.S. foreign policy with those countries. One of the most well-known examples of this centers around Hunter’s involvement on the board of Burisma, a Ukrainian oligarch-owned oil and gas company, which paid him tens of thousands of dollars per month despite his lack of experience in the energy sector or Ukraine in general. At the time, Hunter’s then-vice president father was the point-person negotiating U.S. policy with Ukraine. After leaving office, Joe Biden later bragged about how he threatened to withhold U.S. assistance to Ukraine unless Ukrainian officials fired a prosecutor who had launched a corruption investigation into the company that had hired Hunter.

Hunter also came under criticism for his lucrative business dealings with state-owned entities in China, as Breitbart News senior contributor and Secret Empires author Peter Schweizer has reported in detail.

“In China, [Hunter] travels with his father in December [2013] aboard Air Force Two. While his father is meeting with Chinese officials, Hunter Biden is doing we don’t know what. But the evidence becomes clear because ten days after they return to Washington, his small boutique investment firm, Rosemont Seneca, gets a $1 billion deal,” the Government Accountability Institute (GAI) president explained during a 2019 appearance with Sean Hannity.

“That’s $1 billion with a ‘B,’ later expanded to $1.5 billion. And that deal is with the Chinese government,” he explained. “It’s a deal that nobody else has in China. Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, nobody.”

Schweizer suspects Hunter’s latest venture could potentially be another form of pay-for-play for the Biden family.

“Hunter Biden was repeatedly hired and given deals by foreign entities that he was clearly not qualified for in the hopes of getting favors from his father,” Schweizer told Breitbart News. “It is not a stretch to believe that foreign entities will pay for or commission his works of art at inflated prices to do the same.”

Money laundering in the art world has been identified as an issue, as detailed by a bipartisan Senate investigation last year:

The Senate report details how a pair of Russian oligarchs with ties to Russian President Vladimir Putin allegedly seized on the secrecy of the art industry to evade sanctions by making more than $18 million in high-value art purchases.

“This is just the tip of the iceberg,” investigators for the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations told reporters on a call. The art world is considered to be the largest legal unregulated industry in the United States, according to the Senate investigation.

The Rotenberg example and many other investigation details highlight the fact that, unlike selling stock or making routine bank transfers, art sales through auction houses are not subject to anti-money laundering provisions in the Bank Secrecy Act. When art is sold, according to the report, sellers are not required to confirm the identity of the buyer nor to make sure the artwork isn’t being used to launder dirty money.

“Secrecy, anonymity, and a lack of regulation create an environment ripe for laundering money and evading sanctions,” the Senate report found.

Meanwhile, Hunter Biden, explaining his art, told Artnet, “The universal truth is that everything is connected and that there’s something that goes far beyond what is our five senses and that connects us all.”

“The thing that really fascinates me is the connection between the macro and the micro, and how these patterns repeat themselves over and over,” he added, explaining that art is “not a tool that I use to be able to, in any way, cope.” Rather, Biden said it “comes from a much deeper place.”

Berg s has praised Hunter’s work, as it holds an “authenticity” that he “personally” loves.

“A lot of the issues that are thrown at Hunter is what makes him produce really great work,” the art dealer said.


‘Non-Vaxxers’ in America, Be Ready to LOSE YOUR PHONE Connection When the Vaccine SS Police Start Cracking the Whip

(NOQReport) – Inch by inch, the Democrats want all Americans to lose their rights, lose their health, lose their wealth and then lose their life. It all started with a fear-mongering flu campaign, then the control tripping began, and all in the name of “health and safety.” You’re living in a Black Mirror episode , as you experience the Chinese Communist Party infiltrate America and your livelihood. It started with the fearful scamdemic. Then you were told to wear a Covid mask for a few weeks, maybe months. Then all small businesses and schools were “virtually” shut down (pun intended).

Article by S.D. Wells from Natural News .

Next comes the blood-clotting vaccinations. Then vaccine passports, and now, get ready for your smart device to get SHUT DOWN from the satellite feed because you haven’t gotten inoculated with the world’s most deadly syringe ever. The Covid vaccines have killed more than 5,000 humans, possibly many more, and maimed countless sheeple who lined up for a vaccine that causes blood clots, heart inflammation and death. To make matters worse, it’s all for a virus that was created in a laboratory that can easily be prevented and defeated by vitamin D and zinc.

No deadly vaccines for you? All phone privileges suspended!

In Pakistan, one province has already blocked SIM cards of the mobile phones of the unvaccinated, as the government imports a billion dollars worth of deadly blood-clotting Covid-19 vaccines to force on the populace over the next 12 months. The goal is to wipe out over 100 million people and reduce the population, according to Bill Gates, who loves infiltrating poor countries, nations and cities that are chock full of minorities (like Africa, India, Pakistan and metropolitan cities of the USA) with his toxic jabs, as he promised he could do if he does a… “really good job with vaccines and healthcare.”

A “SIM” card is the subscriber identity module that links each specific user account to their phone, telling the phone’s network company which account is joined up. The Health Minister in Punjab told the government, along with military leaders of Pakistan, that any person who denies getting stabbed with the blood-clotting, deadly Covid jabs will get their SIM cards disabled at “a certain time.”

For healthy people, who aren’t battling cancer, diabetes or heart disease, the Covid vaccines are much more deadly than the actual virus itself. The China Flu has next to a zero death rate for healthy folks, but the vaccine has killed and maimed many healthy people, over 5,000 already, within days after inoculation.

National Command and Operation Center of Pakistan set to shut off cell phones of all healthy people

Being healthy and having natural immunity to viruses and bacteria is now illegal in many countries around the world. If you don’t accept forced inoculation, chemotherapy and other invasive, chemical-based “treatments,” then you are ostracized, denied human rights, denied technology, denied the right to travel and soon to be thrown in jail. The Health Minister in Pakistan is working with the Cabinet and their oppressive Ministry of Health on the timeline from when a person denies the deadly Covid-19 jab to when their phone gets shut off. The decision to block SIM cards of the unvaccinated is already finalized, so it’s just a matter setting the date.

Yes, freedom of speech is directly affected when you cut off someone’s main lines of communication with the world. Their safety is also severely compromised, as they can’t call for help from friends, relatives, police, firefighters or even medics in an emergency situation. It also cuts off their right to freedom of information, to know how and when their crooked, evil government is further planning to take their guns, children, food and land away.

Next for the unvaccinated comes the denial of visiting restaurants, parks and malls. Pakistan is just a litmus test, and the USA will be following suit if the government can take away everyone’s guns first. Get ready healthy patriots!

Visit CovidVaccineReactions.com if you already got a toxic Covid jab and are experiencing side effects, blood clots, adverse events, blindness, deafness or dementia (then have your loved ones help you).

Now tune your internet frequency to Pandemic.news for updates on these crimes against humanity being delivered under the guise of inoculation. Plus, learn how to best prepare for the upcoming vaccine-induced wipeout.

Sources for this article include:


Military Gun Thefts – Over 1,900 Missing Weapons

(UncleSam) – How did an Army Beretta M9 that the Army thought was safely put away at Fort Bragg find its way to New York in the hands of a criminal? Military gun thefts have reportedly caused over 1,900 weapons to go missing over the last decade. An Associated Press investigation that involved FOIA requests and building their own database over ten years revealed a problem with Military gun thefts. What kind of repercussions can the military expect from Congress with their millions and millions of guns and other weapons?

The Beretta M9 was found in the hands of man who was attempting to use a hostage. Though that failed, when police checked out the gun, they found that it was involved in four shootings in Albany, New York. But the gun belonged to the US Army, and they didn’t know it was missing. Inventory records showed it safely stowed at Fort Bragg.

Government records covering the Army, Marine Corps, Navy and Air Force show pistols, machine guns, shotguns and automatic assault rifles have vanished from armories, supply warehouses, Navy warships, firing ranges and other places where they were used, stored or transported. These weapons of war disappeared because of unlocked doors, sleeping troops, a surveillance system that didn’t record, break-ins and other security lapses that, until now, have not been publicly reported.

While AP’s focus was firearms, military explosives also were lost or stolen, including armor-piercing grenades that ended up in an Atlanta backyard.

Weapon theft or loss spanned the military’s global footprint, touching installations from coast to coast, as well as overseas. In Afghanistan, someone cut the padlock on an Army container and stole 65 Beretta M9s – the same type of gun recovered in Albany. The theft went undetected for at least two weeks, when empty pistol boxes were discovered in the compound. The weapons were not recovered.

Even elite units are not immune. A former member of a Marines special operations unit was busted with two stolen guns. A Navy SEAL lost his pistol during a fight in a restaurant in Lebanon.


The US Navy and Marine Corps reportedly track the missing weapons carefully. According to the AP investigation, the Air Force at first claimed there were no records on any missing weapons, but later responded to their FOIA request. The Army had by far the most missing weapons. Is it lax security? The Army generally places younger service members in charge of the armories. Some officials say that the money obtained by selling stolen guns is a temptation.

In November of 2015, James Morales allegedly stole 16 weapons from the Lincoln-Stoddard Army Reserve Armory . The Army attempted to track his cell phone information to see if they could find where he took them. Even though Morales didn’t plan his military gun thefts well, it was still a nightmare for the Service to recover any of them.

Whether it’s one unloaded carbine as Jovan Collazo used to hijack a school bus recently, or 16 weapons from the Massachusetts armory, gun thefts in the military are an issue Congress isn’t likely to ignore.

Congress will likely push some form of accountability because of the Military gun thefts. The notification system for Military gun thefts to Congress reportedly broke down by 2017. Some of the stolen weapons have ended up in the the hands of gangs, and violent felons. Our Armed Forces have literally millions of guns, explosives, and other weapons, and the number of guns stolen is a fraction of those numbers. From the standpoint of public safety, however, this report by the Associated Press will likely cause a bipartisan outcry in Congress.


Featured photo: United States Military Academy Cadets conduct Warrior Tasks and Battle Drills Training during Cadet Summer Training at West Point, N.Y., on Jun. 13, 2021. (U.S. Army photo by Spc. Josue Patricio)


Biden Administration Asks Americans to Report ‘Potentially’ Radicalized Friends and Family

(Breitbart) – President Joe Biden’s administration announced their plans to create ways for Americans to report radicalized friends and family to the government, in an effort to fight domestic terrorism.

In a conversation with reporters, one senior administration official explained the importance of stopping politically fueled violence before it started.

“We will work to improve public awareness of federal resources to address concerning or threatening behavior before violence occurs,” the official said.

The official cited the Department of Homeland Security’s “If you see something say something” campaign to help stop radical Islamic terror as a domestic possibility.

“This involves creating contexts in which those who are family members or friends or co-workers know that there are pathways and avenues to raise concerns and seek help for those who they have perceived to be radicalizing and potentially radicalizing towards violence,” the official said.

Biden began his presidency with a stark warning in his inauguration speech about the “rise in political extremism, white supremacy, domestic terrorism that we must confront and we will defeat.” On June 1, Biden described the threat from “white supremacy” as the “most lethal threat to the homeland today.”

The Biden administration said it would also work with large technology companies on “increased information sharing” to help combat radicalization.

“Any particular tech company often knows its own platform very well,” the official noted. “But the government sees things – actually, threats of violence – across platforms. They see the relationship between online recruitment, radicalization, and violence in the physical world.”

The Department of Homeland Security also plans to deploy “digital literacy” and “digital fitness” programs to help combat “malicious content online that bad actors deliberately try to disseminate.”

The official reassured reporters that the administration’s new strategies would remain “laser-focused” on stopping violent acts.

“This is a strategy that is agnostic as to political ideology or off the spectrum,” the official said. “What matters is when individuals take their political or other grievances and turn that – unacceptably, unlawfully – into violent action.”

The official added the Biden administration was taking the threat of domestic terrorism seriously and would redirect the focus of intelligence agencies on internal threats.

“We are investing many agencies of the government and resourcing them appropriately and asking our citizens to participate,” the official said. “Because, ultimately, this is really about homeland security being a responsibility of each citizen of our country to help us achieve.”


LGBTQ Writers Demand More Hollywood Jobs, Punishment of States with ‘Anti-Trans’ Legislation

(Breitbart) – LGBTQ writers in Hollywood are claiming widespread discrimination in the entertainment industry and are demanding executives take decisive steps to hire more queer, gay, and transgender writers.

They are also demanding Hollywood studios take action against states that have passed “anti-trans legislation” – which presumably refers to laws banning transgender drugs and surgery for minors, as well as laws prohibiting transgender women from competing in girls’ sports.

In an open letter sent Friday, the LGBTQ+ Writers Committee of the Writers Guild of America, West said Hollywood must do more to increase on-screen representation and fight discrimination.

“The industry’s storied history is also one steeped in decades of codified bigotry against the LGBTQ+/queer community,” the committee said in the letter, which was timed to coincide with Pride Month. “The portrayals of Hollywood’s past – and present – are responsible for exacerbating harmful stereotypes and stigmas that have persisted through generations.”

The committee said 22 percent of its members reported having been the target of “overt discrimination or harassment” based on their identity, with the number jumping to 57 percent when factoring in microaggressions.

In addition, 46 percent of the committee’s members reported that they have hidden their identity or felt compelled to do so in an industry environment.

The committee also demanded Hollywood take “action” against states that have passed what it called “anti-trans legislation.”

In recent months, states including Arkansas and Florida have passed laws regarding transgender minors. In some cases, states have banned male-to-female transsexuals from competing in girls’ sports, where they would have a natural advantage over young women.

In other cases, states have banned irreversible medical procedures for minors, including hormone treatment and sex-change operations.

“Many of our productions are in these states. Hollywood must stand up and vociferously speak out against the wave of anti-trans legislation, not simply with words, but with actions,” the letter said.

“The industry has spoken out against anti-abortion and anti-voting laws in the past. We must do the same now.”

Follow David Ng on Twitter @HeyItsDavidNg . Have a tip? Contact me at [email protected]


How Kamala Harris Got Conned Into Becoming the Border Czar

(NOQReport) – To say Kamala Harris’ avoidance of the southern border of the United States is awkward is as obvious as Joe Biden’s embarrassing representation of the United States at the G7 Summit. World leaders and journalists literally laughed at Biden on multiple occasions just as surely as people cringe whenever Harris tries to deflect about her border avoidance.

There seems to be a simple solution. She can go to the border. She’s the Vice President of the United States of America, which means she has time to do whatever she wants and the resources to make it happen. At this point it’s clear she does not want to go… at least not yet. She’s holding out for something, and one of our sources at NOQ Report gave me a bit of insight.

Harris and her loyalists in the White House are fighting Joe Biden’s people. It has been kept under wraps well by the two feuding tribes, mostly because mainstream media would never report on an internal cold war between two Democrats, especially the two they helped to steal the 2020 election.

According to my source, Harris didn’t want to be thrust into the role of “border czar” so they negotiated to have her handle the foreign relations aspect of it all. She did not want to deal with DHS, CBP, or ICE because attachment to those agencies meant she would lose “woke cred” when she did not immediately defunding them the moment she had the chance (which she technically could never do, but don’t trust progressives to understand civics). They convinced her to take on the role of working with nations in Central and South America and told her she didn’t have to deal with border enforcement directly.

Biden’s press conference announcing her new responsibility was relatively clear. The wording was agreed upon by both sides to indicate that she would not be the “border czar” but would be leading diplomatic efforts to address the root cause of migration. A reading of the relevant parts of the joint announcement hints at a carefully positioned expression of what she’s supposed to be doing.

Biden: “So this new surge we’re dealing with now started with the last administration, but it’s our responsibility to deal with it humanely and to – and to stop what’s happening.

“And so, this increase has been consequential, but the Vice President has agreed – among the multiple other things that I have her leading – and I appreciate it – agreed to lead our diplomatic effort and work with those nations to accept re- – the returnees, and enhance migration enforcement at their borders – at their borders.

“We’re already talking with Mexico about that; she’s already done that. We’re going to be dealing with a full team now that we have to be able to deal with the problem here at home, but also to deal with it now in terms of in country.”

Harris: “Well, thank you, Mr. President and for having the confidence in me. And there’s no question that this is a challenging situation. As the President has said, there are many factors that lead precedent to leave these countries. And while we are clear that people should not come to the border now, we also understand that we will enforce the law and that we also – because we can chew gum and walk at the same time – must address the root causes that – that cause people to make the trek, as the President has described, to come here.

“And I look forward to engaging in diplomacy with government, with private sector, with civil society, and – and the leaders of each in El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras to strengthen democracy and the rule of law, and ensure shared prosperity in the region.

“We will collaborate with Mexico and other countries throughout the Western hemisphere. And as part of this effort, we expect that we will have collaborative relationships to accomplish the goals the President has and that we share.”

Here’s the problem. Despite her best efforts to make it clear she was not going to be the “border czar,” nearly everyone in media on both the left and the right determined that she was being made into the border czar. This was an intentional development orchestrated by the Biden wing of the White House. In other words, they trapped her into the role and the only way she could get out of it is if she were to throw Biden and his team under the bus. Doing so would effectively end her political career.

The moment Harris goes to the border, she will be writing her status as de facto border czar in stone. She knows that. Her team knows that. Biden’s team knows that. She’s backed into a corner and her response has been to not give Team Biden the win. She’s holding out for one thing: A public reiteration by Biden that she is not the border czar. At this point, the only way that can actually happen is if he assigns someone to become the border czar, someone who will work under Harris and handle our side of the border while she gallivants to Central America to try to convince people their counties aren’t all that terrible.

This has become worse than awkward for Kamala Harris. It has become full-blown uncomfortable as every public engagement she has is riddled with questions from reporters and hecklers about her conspicuous avoidance. Who will blink first?


Watch: Biden Totally BLANKS OUT When Asked If Putin Is a “Killer”

(InfoWars) – Joe Biden lost his train of thought once again during a NATO summit presser on Monday.

When asked by a reporter if he still thought Russian President Vladimir Putin was a “killer” ahead of a coming face-to-face meeting, Biden awkwardly stumbled and bumbled through an answer that made no sense.

“Well, look, I mean…he has made clear that uh…uhhh..” Biden said before falling silent for almost ten seconds.

“The answer is, I believe he’s in the past excentially [sic] acknowledged that he was uh…there’s certain things that he would do or did do.”

In typical fashion, Biden humiliated himself throughout his visit at the G7 summit in the UK over the weekend, getting lost in a cafe, forgetting names of countries, and defensively fumbling with the press.

This comes amid reports that Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau was overheard at the G7 telling his staffers that he expects Kamala Harris to replace Biden by the end of 2022.

Everybody in the world knows Sleepy Joe doesn’t have the stamina for this.